Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:884
From:	Ed DOT Mueller AT itg DOT ti DOT com (Ed. Mueller)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: I'll ask again: V2.00 Remote debugging support?
Date:	8 Feb 1996 15:09:19 GMT
Organization:	Texas Instruments
Lines:	30
Message-ID:	<4fd3mv$ico@superb.csc.ti.com>
References:	<4fbb0s$gt AT superb DOT csc DOT ti DOT com> <311956c5 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	cna0176689.itg.ti.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <311956c5 DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu says...
>
>> Are there V2.00 debuggers that support remote debugging across a serial 
port
>> for two computers?  If not, are there any plans for supporting this in the 
>> future?  I feel it's easier than debugging using a monochrome second 
monitor, 
>> but that's just my opinion.  The debugging section of the FAQ needs a 
rewrite.
>
>Ladybug for V1.x supported this.  I did a quick hack at one time to get part
>of it running under V2 - I don't know what I did with it (it was about a 
>year ago, when I ported FSDB and EDEBUG).  If I remember right, set the
>zero memory flag, change a few .h files, copy the ed.c file from edebug32,
>and it pretty much worked (except it's now a standalone image linked with
>-ldbg).

Is Ladybug a viable debugger for V2?  Are there any plans to productionize
it for V2?  I might be able to help with such an effort, but I'd prefer to
spend my time working on my program rather than on the development tools.

I'm willing to give it a try.  Please send me more specific details if you
have them.  I assume the source is in the V1 directories somewhere.  If
anyone else is interested in pursuing this, please let me know.  Thanks.
--
Ed. Mueller         The opinions expressed do not reflect my employer.
Ed DOT Mueller AT itg DOT ti DOT com
Texas Instruments Information Systems & Services Group
Plano, TX.

- Raw text -