Xref:	news2.mv.net comp.lang.c:54358 comp.lang.c++:69847 comp.os.msdos.djgpp:648 gnu.g++.help:4420 gnu.gcc.help:5633
From:	russell AT news DOT mdli DOT com (Russell Blackadar)
Newsgroups:	comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,gnu.gcc.help,gnu.g++.help,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: float != float and floats as return types
Followup-To:	comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,gnu.gcc.help,gnu.g++.help,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	30 Jan 1996 06:36:00 GMT
Organization:	HoloNet National Internet Access System: 510-704-1058/modem
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<4eke8g$64m@colossus.holonet.net>
References:	<4ej9lb$mpc AT fu-berlin DOT de> <310D4D9C DOT 7DAB2E1B AT alcyone DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	jubal.mdli.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Erik Max Francis (max AT alcyone DOT com) wrote:
....
: I don't understand what you find surprising.  Both the second and third column
: have the same computation, except that in one of the x^2 function is inlined
: and in the other it is called through a function.  In either case, you get
: exactly the same value.  What is the objection?

What is surprising is that all the columns are not zero!  The original poster
was offering some speculations as to how that might have happened, but as you
say (and I think he'd agree) it doesn't wash.  I ran his posted code and
got all zeroes.  Either there's a *serious* problem with his compiler, or the
posted code is not the same as what he compiled.  Either way, he should try
to pin down the cause of the trouble with more print statements, etc... 
--
Russell Blackadar,   russell AT mdli DOT com

- Raw text -