Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4066
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!rice!news!sandmann
From:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.00 BETA 4 uploaded
Date:	Sat, 30 Dec 1995 10:14:34 CST
Organization:	Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines:	12
Message-ID:	<30e5656a.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References:	<01HZDQRRMQC200027D AT VAX1 DOT ROCKHURST DOT EDU> <4c28cq$a06 AT news DOT tamu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host:	clio.rice.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

>  I had already downloaded and built gcc 2.72 using Beta 3.
> Should I recompile the compilers under Beta 4?  Or would it be better
> to just get the 2.71 gcc and gpp binaries from the beta 4 distribution?

The only real differences you should see are in the libc and crt0.  These
were changed to use a different sbrk() algorithm, fix long file name 
support under W95, fix nested exceptions (CTRL-C weirdness) and other fixes 
you might not notice.  You can probably get by just deleting the final 
binaries and doing a make (if you didn't delete all the .o files).

I'll let someone who actually knows something about it comment on if there
are significant changes between 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 to worry about.

- Raw text -