Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4062
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!frankensun.altair.com!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!uhog.mit.edu!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!oitnews.harvard.edu!news.sesqui.net!rice!news!sandmann
From:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Windows95: ld causes segmentation faults
Date:	Fri, 29 Dec 1995 21:55:44 CST
Organization:	Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<30e4b840.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References:	<DKD31B DOT 3A5 AT jade DOT mv DOT net>
Reply-To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host:	clio.rice.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> I've figured out that gcc works okay in my [w95] DOS box, but ld
> causes a segmentation fault.  Usually the error message
> actually calls it a general protection fault.

I remember having lots of problems with V1.x's ld in the W95 betas.  It
used to lock up the machine hard or corrupt the hard drive.  I migrated to
V2 development so forgot about the problems (I think it was only on SCSI
drives, but I don't remember now).

> Should I get the V2 beta?  Is that more likely to work?

The V2 beta has been tested under W95 (and even supports long file names
there if desired) so should be a supported platform.  The odds of getting
a V1.x fix at this point are essentially zero, unless you compile a new
version yourself.

- Raw text -