Mail Archives: djgpp/1995/02/27/18:03:55
>Once again, this discussion is *NOT* appropriate for the list, so
>send mail directly to this email address (sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu) if
>you have any strong opinions or brilliant ideas. Thanks.
I think some of this discussion is appropriate for this list. Your lack of
response could easily be because people weren't reminded that there was even
a vote. I, for one, forgot.
The guideline of 200+ articles per day is bogus. If I got 200 mail messages
a day from djgpp I'd promptly unsubscribe due to the sheer volume. As it
is now we probably lose half of our subscribers just because of the volume.
I would bet that not even 10% of the existing newsgroups have that kind of
volume. Can anybody check this out?
We need a newsgroup, and an auxiliary mailing list. Let's just get it done.
- Raw text -