Date:	Sat, 03 Dec 1994 09:32:33 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Aaron Ucko <UCKO AT VAX1 DOT ROCKHURST DOT EDU>
Subject:	Re: object file format change?
To:	dj AT stealth DOT ctron DOT com
Cc:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Organization:	Rockhurst College; Kansas City, MO

>What do people think about changing the object file format from COFF
>to ELF for V2.0?  We would be able to make all the configurations 100%
>compatible with Linux to make things a lot easier, and get better
>debugging and linking support too.
Sounds good to me...especially if it also makes shared libs possible.

>The drawback is that all existing libraries will have to be
>recompiled, but is that such a bad thing?  The V2 headers are
>completely different anyway, so this would prevent us from having
>version problems (like structure size differences).  It would mean
>that you can't use V1's gcc to make V2 executables, but I suspect that
>it won't be a problem for long.
Can't the BFD library handle multiple input formats?  (I haven't looked
at the actual source, but the info file seems to say so...)

--- Aaron Ucko (ucko AT vax1 DOT rockhurst DOT edu; finger for PGP public key) -=- httyp!
-=*=-Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.-=*=-
Geek code 2.1 [finger hayden AT vax1 DOT mankato DOT msus DOT edu for explanation]: 
 GCS/M/S d(-) H s g+ p? !au a-- w+ v+ C++(+++)>++++ U-(S+)>++++ P+ L>++ 3(-) 
 E-(----) !N>++ K- W(--) M-(--) V(--) po-(--) Y+(++) t(+) !5 j R G tv--(-) 
 b+++ !D(--) B--(---) e>++++(*) u++(@) h!() f(+) r-(--)>+++ n+(-) y?

- Raw text -