To:	DJGPP List <djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu>
Subject:	unsupported int redux
Reply-To:	pgf AT Cayman DOT COM
Date:	Tue, 08 Feb 94 18:23:30 EST
From:	Paul Fox <pgf AT Cayman DOT COM>

i guess i still don't understand why the int86 handler can't go ahead and
do a go32_dpmi_simultate_int() for the ints it doesn't expect.

at the very least, could we have another entry point for
go32_dpmi_simulate_int that would take the same args as int86?  then a
macro would be trivial.

as someone porting DOS code from other compilers to the
djgpp environment, i now need to find all my int86 calls, and either figure
out which ones are supported as int86() and which need to be translated to
go32_dpmi_simulate_int().  (or, of course, translate them all)

in either case, we'd end up with a situation where both calls always work.

paul

---------------------
    paul fox, pgf AT cayman DOT com (cayman systems inc. woburn, ma)
    	home: pgf AT foxharp DOT boston DOT ma DOT us (arlington, ma)

- Raw text -