From:	kunst AT prl DOT philips DOT nl
Subject:	Re: djgpp vs watcom
To:	rossi AT cs DOT unibo DOT it (Davide Rossi)
Date:	Wed, 7 Jul 1993 15:12:53 +0100 (METDST)
Cc:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu (DJGPP users list)

> 
> 
>>People have mentioned recent reviews comparing djgpp against other compilers.
>>I was under the impression the only compiler that gives equivalent performance
>>is Watcom (at a price!!). Does anyone have any figures on this?
>  
> Someone mentioned an article that compared compilers. I forget the name of the
> magazine, but I read it also and although It does not mention djgpp it does
> mention GNU on other platforms.
> 
> Watcom had a special recently of a DOS only (i.e. NOT OS/2 or MS Windows)
> version of their 32 bit compiler for $199.
> 

Davide Rossi (rossi AT cs DOT unibo DOT it) wrote:
> What about Watcom and C++?

Watcom C/C++ 9.5 has C++.
It supports an amazing amount of 'OSs': (Ext.) DOS, OS/2 2.x, Windows 3.x, 
Windows NT, Win32s etc.

Darryl Okahata (darrylo AT sr DOT hp DOT com) posted a review on Watcom C/386 recently.
(I can't remember if he posted it to this list or another.)
Perhaps he could be so kind to repost it.


 .^^^^^^^^           _____________________________________
 |      |          / Pieter Kunst (P.J.)                   \
 |  _  _|        /   Philips Research Laboratories,          \
.--(o)(o)      /     Building WY3, Prof. Holstlaan 4,         \
|@      _)   /       5656 AA  Eindhoven, The Netherlands.      |
  | ,___|   /        e-mail: kunst AT prl DOT philips DOT nl             /
  |   /     \_______________________________________________/
  /____\

- Raw text -