Date:	Thu, 15 Apr 93 10:02:24 +0200
From:	Peter Rojsel <Peter DOT Rojsel AT maxlab DOT lu DOT se>
Subject:	Re: djgpp v.s. Borland C++ 3.1
To:	jd50 AT prism DOT gatech DOT edu, djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu

jd50 AT prism DOT gatech DOT edu writes:

>I have been using djgpp for a while on a 486/33 with 8 MB ram.
>Recently, I also installed Borland C++ 3.1 because Turbo Debugger
>seems nice. After some inital testing, I was suprised to find
>djgcc compiled code runs much faster than Borland C++ compiled code.
>(This is suprsing to me because I thought these native DOS compiler
>should do a better job in terms of speed.)
>Do people out there have the same experience?

Oh yes!

Peter.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Me:             Peter Roejsel
Org:            MAX-lab, National Laboratory for Synchrotron Radiation
E-mail:         Peter AT maxlab DOT lu DOT se
Hamradio:       SM7LEK
Papermail:      MAX-lab, University of Lund, Box 118, 221 00 Lund, Sweden      
  
Phone:          +46-46-104710        

              "And GOD said: E=mc**2 and there was light!"
    I speak for myself only, anything else heard are only imagined.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

- Raw text -