From:	iis!arnstein AT Sun DOT COM
Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 93 14:07:09 PST
To:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu

Is anyone working on making djgpp consistent with the _latest_ version of gcc?
That would be 2.3.3.

Is anyone working on making djgpp consistent with the _latest version of gas?
That would be 1.38.1.

If you think these projects would be a waste of time I'd like your thoughts
also.

David Arnstein
arnstein AT iis DOT sun DOT com
(408) 432-3400 (please page)
International Imaging Systems
Milpitas, California


rom djgpp-request  Thu Jan 14 18:57:46 1993
Received: by sun.soe.clarkson.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA02293; Thu, 14 Jan 93 18:10:25 EST
Return-Path: <@ctron.com:dj AT ctron DOT ctron DOT com>
Received: from nic.near.net by sun.soe.clarkson.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA02278; Thu, 14 Jan 93 18:10:10 EST
Received: from ctron.com by nic.near.net id aa04764; 14 Jan 93 18:08 EST
Received: from ctron (stealth.ctron.com) by ctron.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA05899; Thu, 14 Jan 93 18:00:19 EST
Received: from express.ctron by ctron (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA00383; Thu, 14 Jan 93 18:00:15 EST
Received: from delorie.ctron by express.ctronFrom djgpp-request  Thu Jan 14 23:58:30 1993
Received: by sun.soe.clarkson.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA07335; Thu, 14 Jan 93 23:37:16 EST
Return-Path: <alane AT wozzle DOT linet DOT org>
Received: from rutgers.edu by sun.soe.clarkson.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA07326; Thu, 14 Jan 93 23:37:08 EST
Received: from mcdhup.UUCP by rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.5/3.08) with UUCP 
	id AA20529; Thu, 14 Jan 93 23:09:30 EST
Received: by mcdhup (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.9)
	id <m0nCfLu-0000LkC AT mcdhup>; Thu, 14 Jan 93 19:56 EST
Received: from wozzle by src4src.linet.org with uucp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0nCdTN-0001RLC; Thu, 14 Jan 93 17:55 EST
Received: by wozzle.linet.org (1.65/waf)
	via UUCP; Thu, 14 Jan 93 08:21:08 EST
	for djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Subject: Re: Support for 486?
From: alane AT wozzle DOT linet DOT org (J. Alan Eldridge)
Message-Id: <s5BDXB2w165w AT wozzle DOT linet DOT org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 93 08:18:03 EST
In-Reply-To: <9301141153 DOT AA10131 AT dfm DOT dth DOT dk>
Organization: Disorganization

src4src!mcdhup!rutgers!dfm.dth.dk!hdj (Hans D. Jensen) writes:

> gcc has a flag -m486 which will use 486 specific commands. I suppose
> it is implemented in DJ's port.

<Doing bad Bronson Pinchot imitation>

Silly! Of course it's implemented, cousin!

<End of bad impersonation>

The -m486 switch is part of cc1 and cc1plus, and therefore is
implemented in all versions of gcc for the Intel CPUs. You should
use it with caution, though: code _may_ run at a signigicant 
performance penalty on a 386.



alane AT wozzle DOT linet DOT org (J. Alan Eldridge)
Fido: The University of Walamaloo 1:272/38.473

- Raw text -