X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2016 20:14:32 -0500
Message-Id:	<201603020114.u221EWsu015460@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<56D62004.9040101@gmx.de> (djgpp-workers@delorie.com)
Subject:	Re: [winter-gcc AT bfw-online DOT de: DJGPP COFF relocation in absolute
	sections]
References:	<201602291610 DOT u1TGAFau002330 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <56D62004 DOT 9040101 AT gmx DOT de>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Thanks!

> In the end the question is does the DJGPP port also need that symbols in absolute
> sections shall not be relocated or not?  Is DJGPP/COFF in this sense different to
> SCO/COFF?  Probably this can only be answered by DJ.  If more help is needed please
> contact me.

I couldn't think of a good reason why we'd use absolute symbols
anyway, as they're usually used for hardware or OS hooks, and that
won't work for DJGPP as we relocate address "0" anyway.  ABS sections
would only be useful for constants but we don't use them for that I
think.

- Raw text -