X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=VJYg0JLX0oxdRi4OAs2GgkMsjRG+oQ0OyR4NDqnvwe8=;
	b=RnuHfWMuq192uq0K7BI3bhUdwr6YB2aK0RHUChmnFncO/jrxjhXJ2dcUN9nN1+7Y8p
	+rH7INBB5KfTCeWB6GZWjvtbpEtDoxeWn8pTYWQfTpxvtc573YKqPiCIw4g64weaKKPm
	R44sksxAzQX2lM3qfbkGzy0oN740kyWkNHYQr35kM3T2WKCX60LRlhIQbX0rfinVpwsS
	SJT/4GpWtxQd59AE44ge5xp4UT7XTBK+fCI9h6FT2u3rRZBpTESgjpkY4W9wHVfaLp2n
	Rf80I8SW4ZJx34+x1SrbjLS/7TU151+LiA16Or7Gm0v88HmuX8Ipb3qgyXspUsF8uhWa
	YIDg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.182.65.35 with SMTP id u3mr14430838obs.8.1374283613013; Fri,
	19 Jul 2013 18:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<51E9D758.8000209@gmx.de>
References:	<51E5D0C6 DOT 1060404 AT gmx DOT de>
	<83y5951a79 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<51E702E0 DOT 3010809 AT gmx DOT de>
	<83fvvc1t0x DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<8738rcsdik DOT fsf AT uwakimon DOT sk DOT tsukuba DOT ac DOT jp>
	<201307180459 DOT r6I4xWxV010383 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<51E9D758 DOT 8000209 AT gmx DOT de>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:26:52 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAA-ihx_SR7sb9+Tq_Ok+VM9FbjPLp9Lvk8a+bXf94oj13MTeWg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Set _IOERR if the file stream has been opened in wrong mode.
From:	Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero
<juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
> Am 18.07.2013 06:59, schrieb DJ Delorie:
>
> If I get no positive response or any response at all, I will not insiste in
> this issue anymore and assume that it is prefered to keep the current
> behavior of the library.

(It's not really my decision, so this is just an opinion.) Sure, fine,
go ahead and patch it. But I still think it's sloppy on their end
(Lua, et al.) to use such a broken idiom. But there's no reason to be
too stubborn if actual code relies on it.

P.S. I'm not subscribed to the Lua mailing list, but apparently that's
the preferred way to report bugs, etc. If you'd like, I'll go ahead
and subscribe and then forward your findings and report back any
relevant comments.

- Raw text -