www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2004/01/04/16:33:54

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
Message-ID: <2d.38425481.2d29e0a8@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:33:28 EST
Subject: Re: Patch for doprnt.c in djgpp v204 Beta
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6021
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

--part1_2d.38425481.2d29e0a8_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 1/4/2004 3:57:03 PM Eastern Standard Time,=20
rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk writes:

> >So, change the name to Roundl, perhaps?  Any objection to that one?
>=20
> Sorry to be pedantic, but I think using case to distinguish two similar=20
> function names is a bad idea.
>=20


Agreed.

> How about these renames:
>=20
>    roundl -> strroundl
>    exponentl -> strexponentl
>=20

That is entirely up to you.  My original submission was as follows:

> There continues to be a conflict with symbol 'roundl' in doprnt.c=20
> and the C99 function roundl().=A0 A suggested fix that works is:

Any name changes that you choose are fine with me.  My interest lies solely=20
in getting the thing compiled.


--part1_2d.38425481.2d29e0a8_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><HTML><FONT  SIZE=3D3 PTSIZE=3D12 FAMILY=
=3D"SERIF" FACE=3D"Georgia" LANG=3D"0">In a message dated 1/4/2004 3:57:03 P=
M Eastern Standard Time, rich AT phekda DOT gotadsl DOT co DOT uk writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"></FONT><FONT  COLOR=3D"#000000"=
 BACK=3D"#ffffff" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10 F=
AMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">&gt;So, change the name to Rou=
ndl, perhaps?&nbsp; Any objection to that one?<BR>
<BR>
Sorry to be pedantic, but I think using case to distinguish two similar <BR>
function names is a bad idea.<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><FONT  COLOR=3D"#000000" BACK=3D"#ffffff" style=3D"BACKG=
ROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Aria=
l" LANG=3D"0"><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT  COLOR=3D"#000000" BACK=3D"#ffffff" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR:=20=
#ffffff" SIZE=3D3 PTSIZE=3D12 FAMILY=3D"SERIF" FACE=3D"Georgia" LANG=3D"0">A=
greed.<BR>
</FONT><FONT  COLOR=3D"#000000" BACK=3D"#ffffff" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR:=20=
#ffffff" SIZE=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"=
><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">How about these renames:<BR>
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp; roundl -&gt; strroundl<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp; exponentl -&gt; strexponentl<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</FONT><FONT  COLOR=3D"#000000" BACK=3D"#ffffff" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR:=20=
#ffffff" SIZE=3D3 PTSIZE=3D12 FAMILY=3D"SERIF" FACE=3D"Georgia" LANG=3D"0"><=
BR>
That is entirely up to you.&nbsp; My original submission was as follows:<BR>
<BR>
&gt; There continues to be a conflict with symbol 'roundl' in doprnt.c <BR>
&gt; and the C99 function roundl().=A0 A suggested fix that works is:<BR>
<BR>
Any name changes that you choose are fine with me.&nbsp; My interest lies so=
lely in getting the thing compiled.<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_2d.38425481.2d29e0a8_boundary--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019