Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2002/11/25/12:35:39
Hello.
Martin Stromberg wrote:
[snip]
> > The other thing I didn't mention above is C99 compliance. It will be a
> > real shame if we release in 2003 and don't support C99. Would someone
> > *PLEASE* look at what's needed to get there and create a worklist?
>
> Well isn't that a lot of functions that still needs to be written? And
> no coders?
Looking at tests/libclink, there seem to be three categories of missing
functions:
(a) lots of new floating-point functions - ~2/3 of the missing functions seem
to fall in this category;
(b) wide-character support;
(c) string to number conversion routines.
I thought K. B. Williams was looking at (a). Does anyone care about (b)? (I
assume someone would have coded it by now, if they cared enough.) I can take a
look at (c) sometime.
Note that I updated tests/libclink using a draft of the new POSIX standard.
Some more functions may turn up, when I go through the C99 standard.
Bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
- Raw text -