www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:57:15 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | uue AT pauzner DOT dnttm DOT ru |
Message-Id: | <8011-Sun27Oct2002185715+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <2.7.9.1OZJT.H4MCDK@pauzner.dnttm.ru> (uue@pauzner.dnttm.ru) |
Subject: | Re: libc' getenv optimization (patch3) |
References: | <10210150631 DOT AA20605 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
<2 DOT 7 DOT 9 DOT 1C51G DOT H41539 AT pauzner DOT dnttm DOT ru> | |
<2 DOT 7 DOT 9 DOT 15OOH DOT H4M4AK AT pauzner DOT dnttm DOT ru> | |
<2593-Sun27Oct2002011523+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> | |
<2 DOT 7 DOT 9 DOT 1OZJT DOT H4MCDK AT pauzner DOT dnttm DOT ru> | |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: "Leonid Pauzner" <uue AT pauzner DOT dnttm DOT ru> > Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 05:32:08 +0300 (MSK) > > > What will this do to programs that access environ[] directly? Since > > If you mean such programs *change* environ[] and then call getenv() - No, I meant programs which read environ[] without calling `getenv' even once. Also, IIRC, functions from dosexec.c bypass `getenv' and `putenv', and poke environ[] directly. > My hash table is only used in `getenv', and is resynced inside getenv. What about `putenv' and `setenv'?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |