www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:15:24 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | "Leonid Pauzner" <uue AT pauzner DOT dnttm DOT ru> |
Message-Id: | <2593-Sun27Oct2002011523+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <2.7.9.15OOH.H4M4AK@pauzner.dnttm.ru> (uue@pauzner.dnttm.ru) |
Subject: | Re: libc' getenv optimization (patch3) |
References: | <10210150631 DOT AA20605 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
<2 DOT 7 DOT 9 DOT 1C51G DOT H41539 AT pauzner DOT dnttm DOT ru> <2 DOT 7 DOT 9 DOT 15OOH DOT H4M4AK AT pauzner DOT dnttm DOT ru> | |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: "Leonid Pauzner" <uue AT pauzner DOT dnttm DOT ru> > Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 02:37:32 +0400 (MSD) > > set_hash_env() now uses a single realloc, if any (literally: only the first > allocation in most cases), its weight is nearly as much as 2 old getenv calls > and definitely less then putenv(). What will this do to programs that access environ[] directly? Since this change resyncs environ[] with the hash table only when `getenv' is called (or did I understand your code wrongly?), won't such programs break?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |