Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2002/10/18/02:06:26
> > Ok, I have no problem with bumping it to 2.04. I think the original
> > reason was to provide something for tools to read to see if there was
> > an API change (new stubbable variables in the header, mostly).
>
> This is what we originally planned, but the original design was
> so excellent it's never been changed :-). The version jumped from
> 2.00 to 2.02 when changes were made for the 2.02 release. So to
> be consistent, we should only increment the number for even numbered
> releases, and 2.04 is next ...
Can someone please bump the verisonin the CVS head file. Do you want me to
send the patch again or is the one in the original from CVS okay?
Andrew
- Raw text -