Message-ID:	<001301c27452$4cc27d70$0a02a8c0@p4>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
References:	<E1816yv-0000xc-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <006b01c27440$5a250620$0a02a8c0 AT p4> <3DAC11E0 DOT 8DEEEB47 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: RESEND: DJGPP CVS and Fileutils 4.1: rm assertion [PATCH]
Date:	Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:53:23 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> Andrew Cottrell wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch I can now use FileUtils 4.1 on XP. I will update
clio
> > over the next few day with FileUtils 4.1 release 3 and the patch. I will
> > upload the soruce so people can re-build the binary files.
>
> Cool. So are there any major bugs that would stop us doing an alpha
release?
> If not, I will try to prepare some "alpha release" packages (djdev, etc.),
> before I go away this Saturday for a month and a half.

Not that I am aware of.  I had a look at the issues that I have found and
what other people have sent (see my status page) and as far as I know ther
is nothing that would stop a DJGPP 2.04 alpha release.

> Andrew, would you mind running your autobuilder against this release, when
> it's done?
I will be able to do a CVS get tomorrow night (in about 18 or 19 hours from
now), time for some zzzzz's. I don't expect there to be many changes since
the last CVS get I did was on the 6th October. I will need to go through
every file that WINCVS says is different to see that all the changes that I
have are included in CVS.

I have not checked or looked at the manifest and dsm files I have for the
DJGPP 2.04 zip files for a long time and as such they may not be up to date.


Andrew

- Raw text -