Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3D7064DA.D5B8A5A2@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sat, 31 Aug 2002 07:40:26 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
CC:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: Two rm.exe issues on XP
References:	<001f01c24f26$b636c730$0100a8c0 AT p4>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Andrew Cottrell wrote:
[snip]
> I may have stumbled onto some issues with the file utilities 4.1 rm.exe
> (don't know if 4.0 also fails) on XP which have come to light when I have
> been trying to build GCC 3.2 or trying to rebuild it. I will not have time
> to to look at these two issues for a few days and as such I thought I should
> let you know about them in case you have ideas or have seen these before.
[snip]

I've just got back from a month-long business trip. Once things are back in
order, I will look at this bug.

In the meantime:

I don't have Windows XP. It would help if you could run symify on the
backtrace that rm gives you on aborting. If you build Fileutils 4.1 from
sources, you should get binaries with debugging symbols included & symify will
work. (I strip the debugging info, when I make binary packages.)

I was planning to do another release of Fileutils 4.1 sometime. If we can get
a fix for this in, it would be good.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -