Date:	Sat, 15 Jun 2002 19:03:12 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id:	<2110-Sat15Jun2002190312+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to:	<001601c21399$28e58650$0100a8c0@p4> (acottrel@ihug.com.au)
Subject:	Re: Clio 2.04 packages
References:	<001601c21399$28e58650$0100a8c0 AT p4>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:46:14 +1000
> 
> With the concensus that we should be figuring out what goes into the 2.04
> and 2.05 releases I think that we should also have (if time and resources
> permit) a parallel project that also works on getting a set of updated
> packages ready for the release at the same time as 2.04.

That's true, mainly because v2.04 will support symlinks, and that
requires all ports to be relinked, otherwise a combination of old and
new binaries will be subtly broken.

> As I see it the following packages need to be updated / released / re-built
> with the 2.04 release :-

Can you tell why did you pick up those and not the others, especially
given my comment about symlinks above?

Please note that rebuilt packages should be at least reconfigured and
sometimes will need source changes due to the symlink support.

- Raw text -