Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3D0709B1.ED4921D4@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2002 09:43:29 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: unixy sbrk and win2k
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020612075151 DOT 14463C-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
[snip]
> That's exactly the original behavior that triggered this thread and
> Charles' debugging of sbrk.  Are you sure you are using the patched
> crt0.S, not the original one which was shipped with v2.03?

I thought this thread was triggered by Laurynas trying to use Emacs on Win2k.
The problem could be different on Windows NT 4. Also, it would be nice for
someone with a "real" Windows NT 4 installation to try this - VMware under
Linux may interfere somehow.

I'm definitely using crt0.S from CVS. I had to use some djdev203 stuff to
bootstrap the CVS check-out, but the crt0.S from CVS is definitely being used.
I've patched it several times and the patches have affected the operation of
Emacs.

Now I'm confused. Which patches should I apply to crt0.S? I've tried the
following:

* Laurynas's DS alias patch;
* Charles's cli patch.

Neither of these made Emacs-with-Unixy-sbrk work.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -