Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3CEF4E7B.17584050@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sat, 25 May 2002 09:42:35 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: refresh++
References:	<10205241453 DOT AA19974 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <002901c20392$d9b3c120$0102a8c0 AT acceleron>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Andrew Cottrell wrote:
[snip]
> Please note that confstr.c as simple as I thought and I am wtill working on
> it as the compiler does not like the following line in the file:-
>       out_len = snprintf(buf, len, "");
> GCC 3.1 complains about the third parameter.
[snip]

What complaint does it have? I suspect it's complaining that there's no format
string. Does it complain about this?

    out_len = snprintf(buf, len, "%s", "");

It looks like this call is intended to truncate the buffer, to return to an
empty string.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -