X-Authentication-Warning:	dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth AT redhat DOT com using -f
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2002 23:29:46 -0700
From:	Richard Henderson <rth AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Toon Moene <toon AT moene DOT indiv DOT nluug DOT nl>
Cc:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, gcc-bugs AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
Subject:	Re: fortran/3924: g77 generates code which is rejected by GAS if COFF debugging info is requested
Message-ID:	<20020522232946.A26305@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	Richard Henderson <rth AT redhat DOT com>,
	Toon Moene <toon AT moene DOT indiv DOT nluug DOT nl>, pavenis AT lanet DOT lv,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, gcc-bugs AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
References:	<3CE93944 DOT 9583 DOT 1336CFC AT localhost> <3CE920E1 DOT 7B6F2448 AT moene DOT indiv DOT nluug DOT nl>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To:	<3CE920E1.7B6F2448@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>; from toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl on Mon, May 20, 2002 at 06:14:25PM +0200
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 06:14:25PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
> Thanks - that means it can't cope with the _bar_+4 thingie [the offset
> of the variable b in the common block bar].  Anyone have a good guess
> what part of the compiler issues this, while it (apparently) isn't
> allowed by COFF standards ?

Issues which?  (plus _bar_ 4) is generated by the fortran front end.
The only thing you can reasonable do is check for unhandled address
forms in sdbout.c and elide debug info for those variables.


r~

- Raw text -