www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
Date: | Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:17:28 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
Message-Id: | <4098-Sun28Apr2002181727+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, zippo-workers AT yahoogroups DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <3CCBD167.3AAD0FF1@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard |
Dawe on Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:39:35 +0100) | |
Subject: | Re: Naming packages in DSMs |
References: | <3CCBD167 DOT 3AAD0FF1 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:39:35 +0100 > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> > > Personally I think that packages should all be named in lowercase, because > having more than one case in package names is confusing for users. But more > importantly the DSMs should agree what names to use for packages. > > What does everyone think? I think zippo should match packages case-insensitively. No matter how hard do we try to lower-case the names, errors are always possible, especially with fast typists using the Emacs M-/ wonder ;-) OTOH, I don't see any reason why we should insist on a specific case. So I think zippo had better not be too stringent about that.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |