X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:50:46 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: binutils & libiconv
Message-ID:	<3C42D426.13310.41B24@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<000001c19b98$f7df5ef0$a67d76d5@zastaixp>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 12 Jan 2002 at 19:43, Tim Van Holder wrote:

> With the binutils from clio, and stock libiconv 1.7
> (BTW, anyone know if libiconv is in CVS anywhere, and
> if so, where?), I get
> 
> gcc -O -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -DLIBDIR=\"/dev/env/DJDIR/lib\" -c ./localcharset.c   -fPIC -DPIC -o
> .libs/localcharset.lo
> f:/djgppxp/bin/as.exe: bfd assertion fail

Try to give sime hint to configure to avoid using -fPIC

> /dj204/gnu/binutl-2.112/bfd/coff-i386.c:529
> f:/djgppxp/tmp\ccixFg6j.s: Assembler messages:
> f:/djgppxp/tmp\ccixFg6j.s:82: Error: cannot represent relocation type
> BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
> f:/djgppxp/bin/as.exe: bfd assertion fail
> /dj204/gnu/binutl-2.112/bfd/coff-i386.c:529
> f:/djgppxp/tmp\ccixFg6j.s:112: Error: cannot represent relocation type
> BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
> f:/djgppxp/bin/as.exe: bfd assertion fail
> /dj204/gnu/binutl-2.112/bfd/coff-i386.c:529
> f:/djgppxp/tmp\ccixFg6j.s:114: Error: cannot represent relocation type
> BFD_RELOC_386_GOTOFF
> f:/djgppxp/bin/as.exe: bfd assertion fail
> /dj204/gnu/binutl-2.112/bfd/coff-i386.c:529
> f:/djgppxp/tmp\ccixFg6j.s:121: Error: cannot represent relocation type
> BFD_RELOC_386_PLT32
> 
> Now I remember getting this before, and IIRC it turned
> out to be a gas thing (either --with-bfd-assembler was
> required, or just the opposite).
> Andrew, did you use the DJGPP config scripts when
> building binutils, or is this resurfacing due to changes
> in binutils or libiconv?
> 
> 
> 

- Raw text -