www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
X-Authentication-Warning: | new-smtp1.ihug.com.au: Host p55-tnt8.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.147.55] claimed to be acceleron |
Message-ID: | <004b01c198f8$23731320$0102a8c0@acceleron> |
From: | "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au> |
To: | <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020108130426 DOT 22876A-100000 AT is> |
Subject: | Re: MSKB Q277628 |
Date: | Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:26:14 +1100 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
> > > I've read that article before. I don't think it should concern us: the > > > problem is reported for Windows 98, 98SE, and ME, where we don't use 7143 > > > subfunctions 5 or 7, even after the last W2K-related changes. Does > > > anyone see a library function which uses these interrupts on Windows 9X? > > > > But perhaps the error is in W2k too, but it's a feature there? > > W2K is an entirely different architecture, so I doubt that. Testing by > Charles and Andrew didn't show any evidence for such problems. So I > don't think we should assume the bug exists on versions other than what > MS says. I stumbled / fell over this one a few months ago (4+ months ago I think) and I can't remember what we did, but the outcome was that this issue has been resolved as far as I can remember. I looked at the archive and seen a refrenece to utime.c in http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2001/0 8/09/07:32:02 (Aug 2001). There was allot of discussion regarding int 7143 at the time. Andrew
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |