www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2001/12/21/02:27:52

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 09:09:16 +0200 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
X-Sender: pavenis AT ieva06
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Cc: DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0.2 and -ggdb debugging info
In-Reply-To: <3C227C35.8DC5059@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10112210905310.35680-100000@ieva06>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com


On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Richard Dawe wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> Does the '-ggdb' option work with gcc 3.0.2? I've been trying to debug a
> program compiled with the '-ggdb3' option with gdb 4.18 and 5.0 and I get
> a 'No line known for main' (or similar wording) when I do 'l main'. I
> tried compiling with just '-ggdb', but I got the same result. When I fall
> back on compiling with '-g', I can debug again.

At least I have used it to debug some libstdc++ problems (filebuf has
problems with DOS style text files, not hopefully fixed as far as I could
in port of gcc-3.0.2. I used prerelease version of gdb-5.1 and now release
of gdb-5.1.

> 
> So, is this a toolchain issue (gdb 5.0 doesn't support something gcc 3.0.2
> does) or is there a bug in gcc 3.0.2's handling of '-ggdb'?
> 

Andris



- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019