From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10110110332.AA20364@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: _findfirst() patch
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2001 22:32:13 -0500 (CDT)
Cc:	ebotcazou AT libertysurf DOT fr
In-Reply-To:	<200110091305.PAA22981@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> from "Martin Stromberg" at Oct 09, 2001 03:05:05 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

These functions look so identical to the current ones to me that it looks
like _find* could just be a wrapper around the current find* routines.
The return arguments and data structures might be different, but at a quick
glance I didn't see anything unique to either set of calls.  Making the
new routines a wrapper around the current ones would seem to minimize
low level code (improve maintenance), decrease code size.  Am I missing
something here?

- Raw text -