From:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To:	Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Bart DOT Oldeman AT bristol DOT ac DOT uk (Bart Oldeman)
Date:	Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:35:57 +0300
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: _open.c commit? (was Re: Selector Exhaustion)
Message-ID:	<3B7D39DD.20454.FB929@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<200108171054.MAA24446@merope.lu.erisoft.se>
References:	<3B7D0F21 DOT 25494 DOT 2689A4 AT localhost> from "pavenis AT lanet DOT lv" at Aug 17, 2001 12:33:37 PM
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 17 Aug 2001, at 12:54, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> Andris said:
> > > However, I'd like to see that patch changed so that plain DOS systems
> > > aren't affected at all.  Why slow down systems which don't need that?
> > > We already have the _windows_major variable that can be used to easily
> > > test for whether we are on Windows, and _get_dos_version(1) can be
> > > used for NT/W2K/XP.
> > 
> > Ok. But I would not like to rely only on Windows presence. One can 
> > try to run DJGPP applications under DOSEMU under Linux and in this 
> > case I have seen descriptors leak (as far as I remeber) at least with 
> > some versions. We may also have bad DPMI providers for DOS which 
> > leaks descriptors. 
> > 
> > So I would prefer to look whether we have good DPMI server.
> 
> Yes. But I imagine that dosemu isn't one of the non-good. Or if it
> is, that the dosemu team wants to know about it.
> 
> And if some versions do leak but later versions have been corrected, I
> think you're supposed to upgrade instead of punishing those that do
> use correct versions.
> 

Verified that I have LDT descriptors leaks under dosemu-1.0.2 (latest
stable version). Patch for workarounding them works Ok

Andris
 

- Raw text -