Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2001 23:34:45 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	haible AT ilog DOT fr
Message-Id:	<4331-Wed11Jul2001233444+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De, translation AT iro DOT umontreal DOT ca,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<15180.44439.430294.692607@honolulu.ilog.fr> (message from Bruno
	Haible on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:48:39 +0200 (CEST))
Subject:	Re: DJGPP support in `gettext'
References:	<15180 DOT 44439 DOT 430294 DOT 692607 AT honolulu DOT ilog DOT fr>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Bruno Haible <haible AT ilog DOT fr>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:48:39 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> A propos portability of gettext to DJGPP:
> 
> gettext-0.11 will include a few new programs that need to spawn
> subprocesses. It uses the new POSIX posix_spawnp family of functions,
> which is explicitly designed with non-Unix platforms in mind (i.e. it
> can be implemented more efficiently than fork+exec on some systems).

Thanks for the heads-up.  Do you have any tentative schedule for
gettext-0.11 release?

> I hope this code will be usable without modifications in DJGPP. If you
> don't have the spec of posix_spawnp and friends, I can send you that
> spec.

We have the spec, thanks.

- Raw text -