From:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:53:53 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: About release of gcc-2.95.3 for DJGPP
Message-ID:	<3AB60F71.7197.B4F7E3@localhost>
References:	<3AB5E7E3 DOT 12572 DOT 1A6E59 AT localhost>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010319132310.23067E-100000@is>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On 19 Mar 2001, at 13:26, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:
> 
> > gcov.exe is working (but requires LFN for that).
> 
> Great!  Thanks for making this happen!
 
Here we should thank to Hans Bernhard Broeker at first. I only applied
his patches.

> Are there any switches to gcov and/or gcc that can be used to make 
> coverage analysis work without LFN support?  If no such options exist, it 
> would be nice to add something to allow gcov to be used without LFN, at 
> least in the next version of GCC.  Otherwise, portions of code that only 
> run on non-LFN platforms cannot be analyzed for coverage.

gcov generates name of output file by appending to name ".gcov".
So for foo.c we're getting foo.c.gcov. 

Andris

- Raw text -