From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: djunpack.bat
Date:	Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:01:21 +0100
Message-ID:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIOEGDCAAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To:	<20010208154453.263.qmail@lauras.lt>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance:	Normal
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> moved somewhere else, like
>  %WHATEVER%/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst
Seems like exactly the right place for a Cygnus-tree based
distribution. Should djunpack also work for a regular GNU
package? If so, '%WHATHEVER%' or %WHATHEVER%/djgpp' might be
better choices.

> 2) Getting rid of that %WHATEVER% above. It is pointing
> to the top level directory in distribution archive. Now 
> GDB-only djunpack.bat can set it to gdb-5.0, however unified 
> unpacker should deduce it at runtime. Any suggestions, how?
You could use a %WHATEVER%/djgpp dir with:

configure.in
djunpack.in
lfnchange.lst
(Makefile.am - maybe)

djunpack.in can probably use something like @PACKAGE@-@VERSION@
instead of WHATEVER (or configure.in could set up some
8.3-friendly version of it and AC_SUBST it).
This would only require minor changes to the top-level makefile
to get djunpack.bat from the subdir when building a distro.

As I understand it, djunpack.bat is put in the right place during
a 'make dist', so this approach should work, since you can't run
'make dist' without first configuring the package.

- Raw text -