www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sat, 13 Jan 2001 09:47:59 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Message-Id: | <2950-Sat13Jan2001094758+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 |
In-reply-to: | <200101122202.RAA15516@envy.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie |
on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:02:55 -0500) | |
Subject: | Re: djasm documentation patch 2/4 |
References: | <20010112143602 DOT B6051 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <200101122202 DOT RAA15516 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:02:55 -0500 > From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> > > > + * djasm:: The DJGPP 16-bit assembler (limited functionality). > > *I* wouldn't say it was "limited". > > > + > > + @c ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > + @node djasm, , update, Top > > + @include djasm.txi > > Would it be better to put the @node inside djasm.txi? I can see > benefits for doing it either way. I think having @node inside djasm.txi is indeed better: it makes it easier to change the document's structure, remove this part or move it around, etc.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |