Date:	Wed, 4 Oct 2000 08:32:38 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
cc:	DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Doc for __dosexec_find_on_path()
In-Reply-To:	<39DA5498.7648334C@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1001004083210.21716E-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Richard Dawe wrote:

> > There's no automatic line breaks inside @example.  So breaking long
> > lines by hand is a Good Thing.
> 
> I've written a Perl script to detect when @example/@end example and
> @smallexample/@end smallexample sections exceed their respective maximum
> line lengths (72 and 74 from a previous mail of yours). The script is
> attached.

Thanks.

DJ, should we add this to djlsrNNN.zip?  Or at least introduce it into
CVS, along with the other scripts used when making the distro?

> I didn't change @example -> @smallexample, but I did fix the overly long
> lines. A large (~55K) diff is attached.

Thanks again.

> > Alternatively, we could change mkdoc.cc to do that automatically for us;
> > but I'm not sure how ugly will the automatic line breaks look.
> 
> I don't think that would be a very pretty option. My script is quick to
> run, so we can check frequently/before release if anything is broken.

I'm worried that any operation prior to release that must be done
manually, might be forgotten.  It happened to me before; it can happen
again to others as well.

- Raw text -