From:	"Richard E. Stone" <restone AT skypoint DOT com>
To:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: stpncpy
Date:	Tue, 1 Aug 2000 09:23:17 -0500
Message-ID:	<LPBBINFBCBNBLIBJHPBGEEKLCAAA.restone@skypoint.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000801091339.13973E-100000@is>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

It was the GNU package glibc-2.1.3, specifically
the file glibc-2.1.3/string/tester.c which has
several string function tests.  I just pulled
the one for stpncpy.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eli Zaretskii [mailto:eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 1:15 AM
> To: DJ Delorie
> Cc: Richard E. Stone; djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: RE: stpncpy
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Richard E. Stone wrote:
> 
> > Attached are two files, stpncpy.c and makefile.
> > Both are intended to be put in the directory
> > tests\libc\compat\string, with stpncpy.c being
> > an addition and makefile being a replacement.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > The makefile adds a line to include stpncpy.c
> > in the tests, while stpncpy.c is a test file
> > for the stpncpy function.  (I basically copied
> > it out of tester.c found in the GNU sources.)
> 
> Which GNU sources (of what package) are those?
> 
> DJ, is it okay for a test to be copied from GNU sources?
> 

- Raw text -