www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 14 Nov 1999 12:00:32 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: GCC porting questions |
In-Reply-To: | <382E6706.E8587179@softhome.net> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.991114115815.17579E-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Laurynas Biveinis wrote: > But this `special kind of GCC build called ``bootstrap''' is the one & only > way to build gcc as described in docs, no matter are you using gcc as system's > compiler, or any other compiler. Sorry, I don't understand. If that is the only way to build GCC, then how did we all build GCC without bootstrap being supported? Last time I looked, bootstrap was not required unless you didn't have a working installation of GCC. Perhaps they've changed the definitions.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |