www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/08/09/03:56:49

X-Authentication-Warning: ieva01.lanet.lv: pavenis owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 10:28:01 +0300 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc: Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990808140548.23423Q@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.9908091021050.40406-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 8 Aug 1999, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > Perhaps it's best to stay with defaults for i[34567]86 for release of 
> > DJGPP port. All similar changes should be carefully tested and 
> > most discussions in latest time were about using even 16 bytes 
> > alignment. But all such optimizations are common for all 
> > i[34567]86 targets and doing them especially for DJGPP would
> > duplicate the same efforts (and I'm not sure we'll do it better)
> I couldn't agree more with Andris.

Larger alignment is not very usefull before we'll have support of such
alignment in binutils. As there are currently no release of binutils that
supports that then I think this topic can still wait (one who wants to
experiment can still use -malign-* command line options)


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019