From:	Andris Pavenis <andris AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>
Organization:	AI LU
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: egcs-19990602 (gcc-2.95 prerelease) binaries for testing
Date:	Mon, 7 Jun 1999 17:13:00 +0000
X-Mailer:	KMail [version 1.0.21]
Cc:	egcs-bugs AT egcs DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<B0000089571 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<99060717171200.00403@hal>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 07 Jun 1999, pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:
> 	compiler generates code which access class member
> 	via wrong address (result is SIGSEGV for me). Below is 		
> 	some test data I got (I simply copied this from rhide watch 
> 	window and added some comments)
> 
>  this: (TEphApp *) 0x240f20
>  App: (TEphApp *) 0x240f20
>  &slrcfg: (LoadedConfigFile *) 0x240f84
>  &App->slrcfg: (LoadedConfigFile *) 0x240f84
>  &satinfo: (LoadedConfigFile *) 0x240fa5             - false address 
> 	 (but this address is used both when I call satinfo.foo() and
> 	App->satinfo.foo() (name changed) from member function)
>  &(App->satinfo): (LoadedConfigFile *) 0x240fa8   - right value (I can 
>       get contents here)
> 
> I have this problem in rather big application (TVision + different 
> other stuff, TEphApp is derived from TApplication such stuff as
> virtual base classes etc is present) only.
> 
> I tried to reproduce this problem in a simple test example but didn't 
> succeed. Perhaps I'll check the same sometime under Linux as this
> app can be built (and it should normally work) also under Linux.
> 

I reproduced the same thing with egcs-19990601 (I updated gcc 2.95
branch with CVS then) under Linux (kernel 2.2.9, glibc-2.1.1). 
As I don't have good test example to send then perhaps I'll retry the same
with later snapshots. Perhaps it would be worth to try also with
gcc-2.96 tree to see whether something changes.

Andris

- Raw text -