Date:	Sun, 23 May 1999 14:14:19 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc 3.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990518142657.24330y-100000@is>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990523141401.14146A-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Is this problem solved in the latest ports of EGCS?  If not, perhaps
somebody could look into it?

------- Start of forwarded message -------
From: sparhawk AT eunet DOT at (Gerhard Gruber)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: -fxref bug?
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 21:27:36 GMT
Organization: EUnet Austria
X-Trace: fleetstreet.Austria.EU.net 902957322 17899 193.154.184.162 (12 Aug 1998 21:28:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT Austria DOT EU DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Aug 1998 21:28:42 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id RAB00964
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Length: 1248
X-Status: 

I'm currently writing a classbrowser and for this I need the information
produced by the -fxref switch. Now I noticed a rather weird statement and I
wonder if this is intentional or if it is a bug.

This is a sample compiled on a hpux system with gcc:

FIL /sfa/entw/src/gui2/gru/tracer/test.cpp /sfa/entw/src/gui2/gru/tracer 0
FIL /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hppa1.0-hp-hpux10.20/2.7.2.1/include/stdio.h
/sfa/entw/src/gui2/gru/tracer 0

And this is a sample compiled with DJGPP on DOS/W95:
FIL d:/bc/srcparse/test.cpp d:/bc 0
FIL d:/bc/d:/gnu/include/stdio.h d:/bc 0

I don't know if you know what the fields mean from that output (I'd be
grateful for any information because I don't know what the numbers mean). The
first entry is the fully qualified sourcefilename and the second parameter is
the working directory where the compiler is called from, to compile the
source. In the second line the first entry gives the pathname of an include
file. As you can see, in DJGPP the compilepath is appended before the include
filepaths whereas this is not the case on UNIX systems. Now I wonder if this
is intentional (why?) or if this is a bug?

- --
Bye,
   Gerhard

email: sparhawk AT eunet DOT at
       g DOT gruber AT sis DOT co DOT at

Spelling corrections are appreciated.
------- End of forwarded message -------

- Raw text -