Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/05/12/19:42:52
Hello.
salvador wrote:
>
> Richard Dawe wrote:
>
> > [lsck073s]
> > dependent=gcc([0-9]{1,})b
> > dependent=mak{[0-9]{1,})b
> > dependent=shl([0-9]{1,})b
>
> I think the dependencies should be more exact, like in .deb and .rpm
> where the depency is to a package (not a filename) and a version
> (>= 2.8.0 as example).
Indeed. In that case I guess one could use the syntax:
dependent>=gcc280b
i.e. dependent<operator><match>
Maybe:
= (or ==), <=, >=, != -> string comparison
=~, !~ -> regular expression, cf. Perl
I used the ZIP file name as the package name. Any other way would require
an information file in the ZIP file, e.g. the DSM I talked about in the
previous mail.
- Raw text -