www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 9 May 1999 14:50:49 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <199905091850.OAA10286@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990509121440.3278V-100000@is> (message from Eli |
Zaretskii on Sun, 9 May 1999 12:15:54 +0300 (IDT)) | |
Subject: | Re: Quirky getch() (fwd) |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990509121440 DOT 3278V-100000 AT is> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Given the forwarded message, should we add fflush(stdout+stderr) to > `getch', like we already did in `filbuf'? Or would programs that use > `getch' hate us for flushing the streams for every input character? First off, you shouldn't have to flush stderr - it should be unbuffered. Second, do the C++ streams use FILE* streams underneath?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |