Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1999/03/22/10:09:53
Please make sure nothing in djgpp uses sh[rl]d before changing the
meaning of that opcode. If you do that, I'll check in your patch.
djasm can have its own directory when it has complete documentation
and omf support, but not before 2.03.
o finish omf support (do you still want that, DJ?)
Yup. It should work with djlink :-)
o enums
OK.
o better symbol handling (allow forward references in most expressions)
In what cases don't they work now?
o better section support (first stage, being able to swap between
.text, .data and .bss at will, later maybe `real' segment support (esp
16/32 bit control))
for coff this would be useful, but I think you're reinventing the
wheel here. Both gas and nasm already handle those kinds of programs.
But if you want to, and it doesn't destabilize it for djgpp, go ahead.
o finalise instruction support for 486
o pentium* instructions
No problem here.
- Raw text -