Message-ID:	<3634A878.E04198B5@montana.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Oct 1998 09:51:05 -0700
From:	bowman <bowman AT montana DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.5b2 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: proposed change to autoconf macro
References:	<199810261122 DOT MAA29344 AT mars DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Martin Stromberg wrote:
> 
> Hmm. Either UMSDOS has a feature that I don't know about (possible), or
> I can state that the DOZE-ness with "C:" et al. is of no concern in
> Linux's umsdos file system (likely).

This is really getting off topic, but I am curious. I put up Linux with
the
UMSDOS system on one of my machines, but have never had occasion to paw
around
the lower levels. Granted that a reference to a drive letter should
never be seen at
the makefile level, is there a layer where DOS style terminology is
used, or do
the Linux drivers completely supercede the bios?

- Raw text -