Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1998/10/13/10:46:14
On Fri, 9 Oct 1998 Kbwms AT aol DOT com wrote:
> Test of acosh(x) vs. xacosh(x): 48.022 48.352
> Test of asin(x) vs. xasin(x)
> & acos(x) vs. xacos(x): 118.407 118.516
> Test of asinh(x) vs. xasinh(x): 38.132 38.242
> Test of atan(x) vs. xatan(x)
> & atan2(x,y) vs. xatan2(x,y): 75.275 75.604
> Test of atanh(x) vs. xatanh(x): 20.165 20.110
> Test of exp(x) vs. xexp(x): 12.967 12.857
> Test of log1p(x) vs xlog(1+x): 6.868 6.923
How come these are so close in run time, while the rest are roughly
twice as fast as libm.a? Could you make sure the times are right,
even as relative ones? I suggest to run them on an unloaded system.
- Raw text -