Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 1998 14:05:29 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
cc:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Patch to mkdoc and re: portability information
In-Reply-To:	<35E43C36.FE7E2EBC@cartsys.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.980827140518.6326I-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Wed, 26 Aug 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote:

> > Am I misunderstanding you?  It sounds vaguely like you're talking about
> 
> When you're documenting a difference, it doesn't matter which way you
> look at it.

I agree.  If the information is there, it helps both ways.

> I just want to make sure that "dos" is as specific as we get.

What I had in mind for the interpretation of "dos" is the way other
DOS-based compilers work.  Usually, they all work in the same way,
that's why having a single category is IMHO enough.

- Raw text -