Message-Id:	<199709032156.RAA01934@delorie.com>
From:	Oberhumer Markus <k3040e4 AT c210 DOT edvz DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
Subject:	Re: 970831: mktime()
To:	dj AT delorie DOT com (DJ Delorie)
Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 1997 23:50:31 +0200 (METDST)
Cc:	k3040e4 AT c210 DOT edvz DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<199709031243.IAA01031@delorie.com> from "DJ Delorie" at Sep 3, 97 08:43:01 am
Return-Read-To:	markus DOT oberhumer AT jk DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at
Mime-Version:	1.0

> Why have a separate function?  Why not just fix mktime() and let
> everyone benefit?

Because your last message says...

> mktime() "fix" for dates within a daylight savings time change (i.e.
> two possible time_t results): I think that this *is* an error, and
> mktime should return -1.  However, the original problem still exists:

- Raw text -