Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1997/08/06/06:33:53
On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Robert Hoehne wrote:
> Does this mean that I also had to include in the binutils
> port all that other big stuff, which normally nobody needs
> on DJGPP (libbfd.a, libopcodes.a libiberty.a, docs about
> the internals of BFD, header files for the additional libraries
> and so on ...) ?
In my opinion, yes. If the resulting package is too large, and you think
the additional libraries/docs won't be used too much, they can be put
into a separate zip file, so only whoever needs them will fetch them.
But that is only my opinion.
- Raw text -