Date:	Thu, 8 Aug 1996 16:52:30 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To:	Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT mathematik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de>
Cc:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Testing binutils 2.7
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.HPP.3.91.960808101559.4619D-100000@newton.mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Message-Id:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.960808165126.20654A-100000@is>
Mime-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 8 Aug 1996, Robert Hoehne wrote:

> strip foo.exe
> 
> the resulting file foo.exe has no symbols (that's correct) but it
> has also no stub, and I think this is not correct.

Yes, it's incorrect.  The stub should also be written out.

> The next problem: If we decide to integrate my or a similiar feature
> to the BFD-libray, to wich version we sholud do it, because the
> BFD-library from GDB 4.16 is, as far as I know 2.6, and I did the changes
> with 2.7.

Is there any problem to build gdb with Binutils 2.7?

- Raw text -