X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	"Wiktor S. (wswiktorSP AT Mpoczta DOT fm) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP and WIndows 10 32 bit
Date:	Thu, 5 May 2016 03:04:44 +0200
Organization:	INTERIA.PL S.A.
Lines:	60
Message-ID:	<nge67d$jtd$1@usenet.news.interia.pl>
References:	<57265177 DOT 1090701 AT iki DOT fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	user-164-127-218-206.play-internet.pl
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	usenet.news.interia.pl 1462410285 20397 164.127.218.206 (5 May 2016 01:04:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT firma DOT interia DOT pl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 5 May 2016 01:04:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Bytes:	2273
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> later versions installed from binaries are not OK. Try compiling
> "Hello World" style program which uses <iostream> repeatedly under
> WIn10 to get random failures. I'm getting them in average once per hundred 
> or several hundreds of compiles. In other
> test I only repeatedly run preprocessor and compared it outputs.


On a 150 MB FAT16 ramdisk I installed the following zips:

bnu226br3
gcc610b
gpp610b
djdev205

and wrote the following BAT file:

==================
@echo off
set /a i=1

:loop
echo iteration %i%
gpp test.cpp -o test.exe
if errorlevel 1 goto fail
set /a i=i+1
goto loop

:fail
echo failed at iteration %i%

==================


test.cpp is a simple hello world:

==================
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

int main()
{
    cout << "Hello, world!" << endl;
    return 0;
}
==================

On the first trial, it failed at 7th iteration with bogus compilation error 
inside iostreams.

Consecutive trials seem to work longer and longer: 8, 14, 36, 84.

So I restarted the machine. Again, failure on 5th attempt.
That's nowhere near "several hundreds" you are getting.




-- 
Wiktor S.

- Raw text -