| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | manni DOT heumann AT gmx DOT de (Manni Heumann) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: class as argument of method of class ??? |
| Date: | 12 Mar 2001 17:04:59 GMT |
| Lines: | 25 |
| Message-ID: | <Xns9062B83DF238Emanniheumanngmxde@130.133.1.4> |
| References: | <3AA25734 DOT 72FA5B67 AT t-online DOT de> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | pec-149-147.tnt6.h2.uunet.de (149.225.149.147) |
| X-Trace: | fu-berlin.de 984416699 2373386 149.225.149.147 (16 [54749]) |
| User-Agent: | Xnews/M3 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Kai Dietrich <toepferei DOT dietrich AT t-online DOT de> wrote on 04 Mrz
2001:
>Hi!
>
>Is this possible:
>
>class test_class
>{
> void methode(test_class *test);
>};
>
>I need to acces a whole instance of a class in the same
>class. Is there a "wourk around"?
>
There is no need for a work-around. Your declaration of
methode() is perfectly legal. Think about the copy-constructor:
Class::Class(const Class&). Of course, you will normally get a
different instance (object). If you need to access the same
object, just access it's members.
HTH,
Manni
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |